|
|
STAR
TREK - A BIBLICAL REVIEW |
|
Hengky Chiok |
| |
| |
|
"Space, the final frontier. These are the voyages of the Starship
Enterprise. Its continuing mission to seek out new worlds; to explore
new lives and new civilizations. To boldly go where no one has gone before."
Since its inception on 1966, Star Trek has gone to where no other TV series
have gone before. Although it has a sluggish start on 1966-1969, this series
is able to develop loyal viewers and. eventually, its own universe.
The influence of Star Trek can be seen when NASA decided to name its
first shuttle craft according to the famous starship in the Star Trek:
Enterprise. Also, it is able to tempt many prominent characters to make
appearance in one or more episodes. They appeared not because they were
invited, but because they asked for it! Another great influence is in how
this series motivate many persons to bring fiction into reality. It was told
that when Dr. Stephen Hawking tour the engineering set of Enterprise, he
paused near warp engine, smiled and said, "I’m working on that."
Because of its capability to influence many people, we need to examine
what is in the heart of this series.
PHILOSOPHY OF STAR TREK
Evolution of humankind
It is not surprising to find that Star Trek found its foundation of
humanity on the evolution theory. As the story assumes the galaxy as its
stage where the story unfold, the evolution is not affect only humanity on
planet Earth, but it also true on other planets in the entire galaxy. In the
entire story of Star Trek, humanoid is assumed as of the same origin despite
of the vast distances separating planets and solar systems. Man and other
humanoids are decent of common ancestry, the humanoid species that lived in
this galaxy some 4 billion years ago. This species apparently seeded the
oceans of many class M planets with genetic material, from which a number of
humanoid forms eventually evolved (pan-spermia). The story goes further to
say that when scientist is able to decode the DNA sequences on various
humanoids, it contains a message of peace and goodwill. This means that Gene
Roddenberry assumes the position of what now called naturalistic evolution
as the basic philosophy of this famous series.
Naturalistic evolution teaches that while organic materials and even
living organisms came to earth in cosmic dust, the instructions for the
evolution of higher organisms were then provided by some higher intelligence
from outside the earth. In this sense, naturalistic evolution not only
denies creationism as taught in the Bible, it also denies theism by
advocating higher intelligence in place of God, the Creator. In the Star
Trek series, the idea of God is viewed as developed out of primitive
intelligence which view cosmic phenomena as representing God, where in fact
it is simply a result of alien higher technology and power. For instance,
Apollo, the god of light in ancient Greek myth, is a humanoid entity that
came to earth from outer space and received adulation from the ancient
Greeks.
On one hand, naturalistic evolution tries to answer the question on "what
is then the purpose of life" that left unanswered by Darwinistic evolution
and pre-biotic evolution; but on the other hand, naturalistic evolution
finds the chief end of man as lies within himself, and so presenting man as
independent and capable of achieving what he wants.
Practical Atheism
God is presented as merely another creatures, the one with higher
intelligent. While occasionally reference to the religion and religious
aspect of society will be made, it is simply viewed as part of culture, some
times it is even considered as a primitive one, negligible, and irrelevant
to humanity. Gene Roddenberry on 1975 even made a remark (when he was
scripting Star Trek episode The God Thing), "We begin pondering the
notion that perhaps mankind has finally evolved to the point where it has
outgrown its needs for gods, competent to account for its own behavior
without the religiously imposed concepts of fear, guilt or divine
intervention." Apparently, this script did not make it to the screen.
However, in various episodes of Star Trek, the same idea can be seen
clearly. In Who Mourns for Adonais Apollo is a powerful
extraterrestrial being who visited Earth some 5,000 years ago and worshipped
as god, together with other extraterrestrial beings such as Zeus, Artemis,
Athena and Aphrodite. While Star Trek limited the calling of names only to
the mythical figures, it does not mean that it takes religions seriously. It
seems that it only tries not to offend official religions. Throughout its
various episodes, religions are presented usually as primitive and
irrelevant and cultural affair, and sometimes as another way to explain
powerful extraterrestrial beings. Human is capable of many powerful things
that religion falsely attributed only to God. It seems that Star Trek lives
the saying: What was once known as religion is now science.
The golden age of humanity
Throughout this series, humankind is portrayed as superior race that has
been able to overcome mistakes that lead to the misery and devastation of
mankind in the past. In the Star Trek story line, there were mentioning of
Eugenics wars (end of 1990s) and WW III (mid 21st Century). These
wars are the turning points in human history. From that time onward,
humankind is some how united and work together toward universal peace. With
the invention of warp drive that enables faster than light travel by Zefram
Cochrane in 2061, mankind is now able to move to space. With fights and
miseries left behind, mankind is now entering the golden age. Mankind now
lives without material oriented, health conscious (e.g., the existence of
non-alcoholic liquor that preserves all the taste of liquor without damaging
effect of alcohol), and the ability of mankind to expand his territory to
space (space is "the final frontier). Life is dedicated for science and
universal peace.
In this series, the idea of reincarnation appear clearly although it is
presented in rather subtle forms. In the 1982 Star Trek II: The Wrath of
Khan was released with the ending where Mr. Spock is dead. Yet the ending is
created in such a way that his dead is rather ambiguous, and the answer is
found in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock featuring the return of Spock
from the dead; not because he was not dead, but because prior to his death,
he kept his katra (living soul) in the mind of his friend, Dr. McCoy.
Because of this when his body was retrieved, his soul can be successfully
united with his body. Although this was considered as rare opportunity, it
was still a possibility to do so. If this is considered simply to create
suspense and to provide an opportunity for the sequel to continue, the
following examples are definitely portray the idea of reincarnation in this
series.
In the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, we encounter a woman named Jadzia Dax.
What unique of this woman is that she is a Trill.
A Trill is a joined species comprised of a humanoid host and a small
vermiform symbiont that resides in an internal abdominal pocket of a
host body. … Upon the death of a host body, a Trill symbiont can be
transplanted into another host. … The resulting new joined life-form is
considered to be another person, although it retains memories of
previous joinings. In joining with previous hosts, Dax had been a mother
three times and a father twice.
Compare this with what Shirley MacLaine said about her past lives:
"I know that I must have been many different people in many different
times." She has claimed to be " a former prostitute, my own daughter’s
daughter, and a male court jester who was beheaded by Louis XV of France
… She was also remembered very clearly the feeling of living in
Atlantis. … "I was a man, a great teacher, very much in love with my
wife, … I couldn’t stand the thought of drowning, so I killed myself."
Conclusion
From our review on philosophy behind Star Trek, we find out that they
fall very well into the parameter of New Age movement. Although "officially"
New Age was unknown until early 1970s, the idea of New Age is not really
new. The root of New Age can be traced back to Hinduism of India. In this
sense we may call New Age a modern and far more complicated form of Hinduism
because of its mixture with other religions; or better, New Age is a modern
revival of ancient religious traditions, along with potpourri of influences:
Eastern mysticism, modern philosophy and psychology, science and science
fiction, and the counterculture of the 50s and 60s. Since New Age is a pure
movement (i.e., without any organization), it is able to be an umbrella for
several other movements. This also lends to its flexibility to penetrate
almost all aspects of life in very subtle ways.
Several basic philosophies of New Age as have been mentioned in the
review are monism, pantheism and naturalism. Monism is a belief of the
oneness of reality. In the Eastern religions, Monism is a basic philosophy
behind Buddhism and Hinduism. These two religions believe that the ultimate
end of everything is when everything becomes one in unity, all reality is
reduced to a single, unifying principle partaking of the same essence and
reality. Buddhism for instance, considers the unity with the essence of the
cosmos as the ultimate goal (nirvana).
Monism related closely to Pantheism, a belief that god and nature is one;
everything is god, god is everything. God is the forces and laws of universe
but is not a Being with personality. It also closely related to naturalism.
Man is created by God.
As mentioned above, Star Trek never explicitly deny the existence of God,
yet it is very clear that this series consider man as simply a result of
naturalistic evolution. In Star Trek, the idea of pan-spermia is a basic
perspective on humanity. This is a direct confrontation with the teaching of
Scripture. The Scripture clearly tells us that man is created by God in His
image and likeness (Gen 1:26, 27). This is the basic of everything
concerning mankind. By recognizing God as the Creator, man has a dignity and
purpose in life, something that is lack in naturalistic evolution. While New
Age and Star Trek try to paint a glorious goal of man’s life, it falls short
in that they find the chief end of man in the exaltation of himself. This is
a modern Babel (Gen. 11:1-9). They do not have answer to what is then the
purpose of life if after achieving what he wants man must die. Although Star
Trek tries to put altruism as the governing principle (in the form of Vulcan
principle: the good of many exceeds the good of one) yet the definition of
good is relative. Only in the Scripture man is presented with his real
purpose of living and dignity. Man is not of nature, although physically he
is of dust. Man becomes a living being only when God breaths His Spirit into
man (Gen 2:7).
God is personal Being
God is not simply a cosmic energy, ultimate essence, or deified person.
The Scripture clearly describes God as a personal Being, a Living God who
enters into various relations with His creatures, relations which are
indicative of several different attributes. God is self-existence,
self-contained, All-perfect (Ps 18:26, 27; 33:11; 90:2; 94:8; 115:3; Isa
40:18; Dan 4:35; Prov 11:20; 12:22; Jonah 3:10; Mt 5:48; Jn 5:26; Acts 7:25;
17:29; Rm 11:33, 34; Eph 1:5). Portraying God as less than Who He is is a
blasphemy.
Man born and died once, and only once.
This is a contrast to what is presented in Star Trek. The Scripture says,
"It is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment." (Heb
9:27). The death of man is the result of his sin (Rm 6:23), and man will one
day present himself before the Lord to be judged. This Scripture description
of man’s life and death is a contrast to the concept of reincarnation.
Reincarnation teaches that in his attempt to achieve perfection/bliss,
the soul will be reborn according to previous karma. Better or worse,
it depends totally on the karma. As a result, life is unending circle
of dead and reborn. Man is hardly able to achieve nirvana, i.e.,
released from the circle of reincarnation. Even gods still subject to this
circle and may fall to be a lesser being. A powerful tool in evangelizing
people with such concept is the picture of a circle of reincarnation, broken
in two points, the incarnation of God the Son and his resurrection and
ascension to heaven. Without God man is hopeless. Reincarnation simply is an
expression of the inability of man to comprehend the nature of mankind
because of the wrong perspective. Man should be viewed from the perspective
of God and not from himself.
Man’s achievement without God is sin.
Star Trek portrays man in the golden age (New Age’s Aquarian Age) as a
great achievement based on human wisdom. It is assumed that man has learnt
from history and evolved into higher view of life. Yet what is portrayed is
simply the repetition of Biblical Babel (Gen 11). The point is without
recognizing god in his life, everything he does is against God. Whatever
achievement man has, without God it is pointless and will lead to self
exaltation.
Sin is not simply a wrong or bad behavior; it is a pride in essence. In
Star Trek man is portrayed almost as the center of universe. Man is finite,
yet he is capable of doing great things, including altering history if he so
wills. In Star Trek several times it is told that the crew of Enterprise go
back in time to perform their duties. Only their wisdom not to interfere
with the flow of history keeps them from changing history. Man in his
knowledge is considered as able to decipher many secrets of universe and
find that almost everything has a scientific explanation. Then everything
will subject to man’s knowledge. Star Trek is a deification of man and
therefore a sin against God.
IV. Conclusion
Many features in Star Trek have influence and motivate the progress of
science. The bridge of Enterprise for instance, has been studied numerous
times by various defense and aerospace organizations for an efficient
futuristic control room. At least one such computerized command center has
actually been built, closely based on the design of the Enterprise bridge.
Quantum singularity in Star Trek has been the focus of study by people such
as Stephen Hawking, even postulated by him.
The problem is that with its New Age agenda it is a subtle invasion to
mind to persuade man to be independent of God. Star Trek deceives man to
ignore, at least to undermine God.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alnor, William M. UFOs in the New Age Grand Rapids: Baker Book
House, 1992
Asherman, Allan The Star Trek Compendium New York: Pocket
Books, 1986
Berkhof, Louis. Systematic Theology Grand Rapids: Wm Eerdmans
Pub Co, 1986
Burns, Lanier. Humanity, Sin and Angel Unpublished classnotes.
Dallas Theological Seminary, 1997
Chandler,Russell Understanding the New Age Dallas: Word
Publishing, 1988
Irwin, Walter; G. B. Love (eds.) The Best of Trek New York:
Penguin Books 1994
Okuda, Michael; Denise Okuda; Debie Mirek The Star Trek
Encyclopedia New York: Pocket Books, 1994
Shatner, William; Chris Kreski. Star Trek: Movie Memories New
York: HarperPrism, 1994
Solow, Herbert F.; Robert H. Justman. Inside Star Trek: The Real
Story New York: Pocket Books, 1996
|
| |
| |
| |
|